4 Comments

It’s strange to think maybe they’ve priced on the inelastic part of demand in the first place. Which I’m assuming is the case if they can raise price 38% without losses.

Expand full comment
author

Earlier this month Iger had announced that they messed up on the initial pricing: "In our zeal to grow global subs, I think we were off in terms of our pricing strategy, and we’re now starting to learn more about it and to adjust accordingly."

Maybe this price change was what made them realize JUST how off they were. You'd think losing 4 billion per year on streaming would have been enough of a signal.

Expand full comment

Anyway, great substack! Keep up the good work!

Expand full comment

Maybe they were doing one of those leader things. If demand is inelastic, and switching very costly and membership sticky, for all I know you want to give it away, get people hooked, and then raise the price accordingly. But I guess too pricing is based on market demand and as the market grows, those elasticities will shift requiring adjustments in pricing.

Expand full comment