When The People’s Union USA announced its one-day “Economic Blackout” on February 28, the concept was straightforward: hit big corporations where it hurts—at the register.
Could've been titled "economic illiterates' ill-conceived plan predictably fails."
I am not so gracious as to call their intentions good. The kind of people calling for these 24 hour boycotts are unserious people and should be rebuked roundly.
These points are well taken, long term strategic thinking more than one day boycotts is required to work towards a better, more fair economy.
Which is why I'm perplexed that there is no mention of supporting unionized labor and companies who negotiate in good faith with them, in no small part, for more predictable, and less just-in-time scheduling.
Excellent commentary as always, Jadrian. Unfortunately, these issues are just too complex for the average American. Most of us are looking for simple answers, and don't have the time/proclivity to think about the second- and third-order effects, or unintended consequences, of our actions and policy decisions. I struggle with how to communicate the complexity to a wider audience. Appreciate your help in trying to translate complex issues into something understandable!
This was a probe. It was meant to gauge the reach of mobilization. Everyone knows that one day won’t be enough. That’s why testing like market testing is a research or reconnaissance activity. Sustained programs take time and Lego building blocks. Big waves are made from small changes in currents and winds.
Could've been titled "economic illiterates' ill-conceived plan predictably fails."
I am not so gracious as to call their intentions good. The kind of people calling for these 24 hour boycotts are unserious people and should be rebuked roundly.
These points are well taken, long term strategic thinking more than one day boycotts is required to work towards a better, more fair economy.
Which is why I'm perplexed that there is no mention of supporting unionized labor and companies who negotiate in good faith with them, in no small part, for more predictable, and less just-in-time scheduling.
Excellent commentary as always, Jadrian. Unfortunately, these issues are just too complex for the average American. Most of us are looking for simple answers, and don't have the time/proclivity to think about the second- and third-order effects, or unintended consequences, of our actions and policy decisions. I struggle with how to communicate the complexity to a wider audience. Appreciate your help in trying to translate complex issues into something understandable!
This was a probe. It was meant to gauge the reach of mobilization. Everyone knows that one day won’t be enough. That’s why testing like market testing is a research or reconnaissance activity. Sustained programs take time and Lego building blocks. Big waves are made from small changes in currents and winds.
Curious how the "Economist" thinks boycotts do more harm than good....
to WHOM, I wonder? To corporations, which is where an "economist"'s sympathies lie, obviously!